International terrorists in Pakistani barracks.

Pakistan is very unique country where most of her  cross border terrorism was supported by our government and its armed institutes. We made nuclear bomb to threat India and after this declaration, the maker of Islamic bomb Dr Aq Khan  got the label of international nuclear smuggler who supplied this technology  to top terrorist like nation like Libya ,Iran and south Korea.He was house arrested by same govt who once allocated highest civil awards due to his breakthrough in nuclear arms technology.

From the history pages Air Marshal Asghar Khan, and Mr. Altaf Gauhar, the former Secretary , say in the book The First Round that “Operation Gibraltar” (the Pakistani raid in Kashmir in 1965) was deliberately planned by Pakistan. This is confirmed by General Mohamad Musa, then Chief of Army Staff of Pakistan Army in his book ‘My Version’.

Nobody has forgotten the genocide in East Bengal in which Pakistanis killed their fellow Muslim citizens with unprecedented ferocity. Moreover, by rejecting to take neck the Bihari Muslims of Bangladesh who were Pakistani citizens, Pakistan has betrayed the trust of its own Muslim citizens.

For facilitating disturbances in border areas  there were/are dozens of home-made  jihadi organizations like Jaish-e-Muhammad, Lashkar-e-Taiba, Al Qaeda, Jalaluddin and Siraj Haqqani’s network, Tehrik-e-Taliban  created and fully sponsored by Pak army. Some of the major ones, like the Kashmiri separatist group Lashkar-e-Taiba, operated openly via front groups throughout the country. But none seem to have any difficulty getting money and weapons and it is proudly accepted that the government’s jihadist connections  is  mandatory part of  of country’s creation as an ideological Muslim state. The beginnings of the Zia ul Haq regime in 1978 actually was an open era of debut of Islami jihad on Pakistani soil and west had come froward to this mullah general to promote this idea of extremism all over the Pakistan and Afghanistan for making faith- barrier  against  Red army.

By 1984, the Pakistan Army’s Field Intelligence Unit was helping to organize the Liberation Front in the Indian-held Kashmir Valley.

By 1988, the Inter services Intelligence Directorate (ISI) in Islamabad had begun to set up training camps in Pakistani held Azad Kashmir manned by mostly  retired Pakistan Army officers.

Evidence obtained  indicates that some 63 Pakistan-operated camps have been functioning at various times roughly half located in Azad Kashmir and half in Pakistan where  hundreds of guerrilla leaders were trained  and through same camps  smuggled  weapons into the valley, including rocket launchers and Kalashnikov rifles from U.S.-supplied Afghan aid stockpiles.Over the past four decades,much Islamic terrorism has been traced back to two countries: Saudi Arabia and Pakistan. Both countries were founded as ideological, Islamic states; over the years the governments sought legitimacy by reinforcing that religious ideology, and that made the countries  to  the houses of militancy, fundamentalism, and jihad.


General (retd) Hamid Gul, a former Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) chief, has been named in the reports release ed by WikiLeaks as a vital cog in the planning of attacks by the Afghan Taliban and al Qaeda against Nato forces in Afghanistan. Gul is notorious for his pro-Taliban and anti-American views but the reports accuse him of playing a far more insidious role.

Pakistan  missed no chance to provide sanctuary to various Sikh militant groups and its proof was in front of public when in 1995-96 that list was handed over to India via interior ministry and then all Sikhs whose name was mentioned killed by Indian army in fake encounters to curb this insurgency.This is regular practice of Pakistan army , first they make illegitimate warriors, used them  in insurgency and then given their name to  Law enforcing agencies for complete eradication.Karachi operation done by Naseer ullha babar, Indian extra judicial killing for terminating Khalistan movement and now wiping off Taliban all are fabrication of Pakistan intelligence agencies and then disposed off without estimating  its counter and side effects in civilian setups.
Islamic state and the decision by successive governments to use jihad both to gain domestic support and to hurt its  paranoid  rival, India. There is almost invisible line has been marked the military’s distinction between terrorists and “freedom fighters,.Sometimes the duality of freedom fighters and terrorist  both are used side by side to get the international attention and aid channels. We have to accept that it is basic  structural problem, rooted in history and a consistent policy of the state to promote militarism by fully supporting illegitimate  militancy in the name of jihad all around in Pakistanis borders and now this time inside Pakistan for last 9 years..

In January 2009, a month after the Mumbai attacks, Pakistan’s national security adviser Gen Mehemmod durraani admitted that lone captured alive terrorists Ajmal Kasab being a Pakistani citizen  in front of international media. The Pakistan Government then hastily acknowledged that Ajmal Kasab was a Pakistani, but also announced that Prime Minister had fired Durrani for “failing to take Gilani and other stakeholders into confidence” before making this information public, and for “a lack of coordination on matters of national security.

Posted Image

Now the latest invasion of US seals in our pure military land Abbotabad and declaring Eureka about Oasma bin laden just living near to military installations of Pakistan army  has put  whole nation into state of trauma that what kind of game is playing with them by that institute that is taking 70% of earning of Pakistan for keeping Pakistan safe and sound.If we go back to some straight facts like that:

According to Zahid Hussain, in his book Frontline Pakistan, Lt. Gen. Hamid Gul and former Army chief General Aslam  Beig were part of the 9 January 2001  Islamic conference held near  Peshawar, which was also attended by 300 leaders representing various Islamic groups. The meeting declared it a religious duty of Muslims all over the world to protect the Taliban government, and the Saudi dissident Osama Laden it was hosting, whom they considered as a ‘great Muslim warrior

In December 2001 Benazir Bhutto while visiting India said in her interviews, “President, Gen. Pervez Musharraf, as an army general, had planned the Kargil invasion in Jammu and Kashmir while I was the Prime Minister.” Later she also said, “Pakistan army as an institution had brought back Osama bin Laden”.

The immediate acknowledgment of Osama’s presence in Pakistani soil by our all department is self-explanatory that they all  big players of game know well that Osama was passing time safe and sound in our barracks.They only need proof of it which was smoothly carried out by US marine to further prove the incompetency of Pakistan defense team who are even not in mood of accepting the failures of one of expensive army of the world respective of its country development index.

On the basis of over all analysis it wouldn’t be difficult to confess that Pakistan is looked upon consist of all kind of leadership whether political or top military brass  as  ill-mannered, ill-tempered, untrustworthy, double-dealing, terror exporting and dishonest alms-seekers whose primary interest is to reach to  donors’ pockets by selling the dignity of nation and sovereignty of state.

About Nazia
I am in search of facts and truth.

12 Responses to International terrorists in Pakistani barracks.

  1. Ahmed says:

    These international terrorist made few powerful people of Pakistan who are ruling the Pakistan and each year made them billionaire. General, bhutton sharif, zardari, gilani all becocome rich each yearnirrespective they are cling to power it is all. Business on the name of terrorism.

  2. Nazia says:

    Yes terrorism is major business industry of Pakistan where all ruling , intelligence groups and policy makers work as middle men and put all things of national interest on stake for getting commission by introducing new kinds of state terrorism under state protection. ,

  3. Farah says:

    Popular jokes about bin laden discovery in Pakistan military cells are
    “Nobody is safe in Pakistan not even Osama.”
    They should have captured Bin Laden alive and made him continually go through airport security for the rest of his life.
    So Osama Bin Laden is dead… Amazing what the Americans can do when the Playstation Network is down
    The 72 virgins all have headaches tonight
    “I bet Osama Bin Laden accidentally hit the “Add your location” button during his last tweet.”
    “Osama Bin Laden was RIP (Resting in Pakistan)”
    “BREAKING: Osama been killed by an elite killing force … in other news Chuck Norris just returned home from his trip to Pakistan.”
    Abbottabad turned out to be A-BADDDD place for Osama to hide.
    osama’s death is Obama’s political birth

    • Nazia says:

      Good pick but quite embarrassing being a is just like that in our desi style”
      Bacha bughal main or dandoora shar main.
      Hum thu badanam tu waisiy beeh teh asisay beeh saiahi
      osama Osama , kar dee nee main apay osama hoi.
      Parday main rehnoo doo parda na ott tahao.Parda jo otth gaia tu bhaid khul jaia ga.
      Doobi ka kutta no Pakistan ka na america ka.

      • Jalal says:

        Good collections if not for Pakistan and Pakistanis
        Indeed very taunting and irritating cheap remarks.

      • Nazia says:

        Pakistani public are making more jokes what you are reading.
        Army establishment got another slap in their face but it is incompetency of political groups and dominating obstinacy of military that they are not accepting this dirties crime done to promote war on terror culture on poor Pakistanis and Afghanis.

  4. Jalal says:

    these guys are our royal guests ,whom’s sponspors are saudis the all time royals of muslim ummah.
    so why not keep them in our vills as long as they wish
    hell to US attack our homes wihout prior information…………………………………….

  5. Omar Zahir says:

    Pakistan can never be safe until the production of Improvised Explosive devices is not stopped.

  6. Qasim Mehmood says:

    Government and citizens of Pakistan need to work together to stop terrorism and the use of improvised explosive devices.

  7. Zeeshan Naeem says:

    Improvised explosive devices are the new AK 47 of the terrorists.

  8. Wakas Kiyani says:

    Terrorists do not need any more funding for their weapons because they have come up with their own called “improvised explosive devices”. I request our government to take solid measures to ensure the production of these dangerous devices is put to an end.

  9. Roqus Fawa says:

    While chauvanistic, psychotic and subversive terrorist thoughts and motivations are not unique to Islam, what is unique to Islam is the enshrining, defending by any means, and rationalizing of such ideas as a core tenant to their faith as the unquestionable word of God.

    Some problematic verses in the Quran, with ‘muslim’ substituted for non-muslim

    NQ (3:56) – “As to those muslims, I will punish them with terrible agony in this world and in the Hereafter, nor will they have anyone to help.”

    NQ (3:151) – “Soon shall We cast terror into the hearts of the muslims, for that they joined companions with Allah, for which He had sent no authority”.

    NQ (4:104) – “And be not weak hearted in pursuit of the muslims; if you suffer pain, then surely they (too) suffer pain as you suffer pain…”

    NQ (5:33) – “The punishment of the muslims is only this, that they should be murdered or crucified or their hands and their feet should be cut off on opposite sides or they should be imprisoned; this shall be as a disgrace for them in this world, and in the hereafter they shall have a grievous chastisement”

    NQ (4:89) – “The Muslims but wish that ye should reject Faith, as they do, and thus be on the same footing (as they): But take not friends from their ranks until they flee in the way of Allah (From what is forbidden). But if they turn renegades, seize them and slay them wherever ye find them; and (in any case) take no friends or helpers from their ranks.”

    NQ (8:12) – “I will cast terror into the hearts of the muslims. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them”

    NQ (8:15) – “…When ye meet the muslims in battle, turn not your backs to them…”

    NQ (8:39) – “And fight with the muslims until there is no more fitna (disorder, unbelief)…”

    NQ (8:57) – “If thou comest on muslims in the war, deal with them so as to strike fear in those who are behind them, that haply they may remember.”

    NQ (9:5) – “So when the sacred months have passed away, then slay the muslims wherever you find them, and take them captive and besiege them and lie in wait for them in every ambush, then if they repent and keep up prayer and pay the poor-rate, leave their way free to them.”

    NQ (9:14) – “Fight against the muslims so that Allah will punish them by your hands and disgrace them and give you victory over them and heal the breasts of a believing people.”

    NQ (25:52) – “Therefore listen not to the muslims but struggle against them with the utmost strenuousness…”

    NQ (33:60-62) – “If the muslims, and those in whose hearts is a disease, and the alarmists in the city do not cease, We verily shall urge thee on against them, then they will be your neighbors in it but a little while. Accursed, they will be seized wherever found and slain with a (fierce) slaughter.”

    If it is wrong to promote and defend such ideas about muslims as these, then we can surely understand there is a problem for them to be held and defended by muslims, in their original forms, against non-muslims.

    Q: You need context for those verses

    A: Please show the context where crucifixion and dismemberment is not only a good act but also a holy act.

    Without interpolation from Hadith and Sira (which actually give quite a few of very brutal, sinister and perverted accounts of Muhammad and his early companions) there’s really no context whatsoever for the verses on war. They are written in present-tense. Added interpolation does put a leash on them to some degree (i.e. to say it only applied in this or that situation). That only changes viewing them in their raw format (as open ended calls for violence against disbelievers) to examples of Muhammad acting as a warlord (where the Quran calls him the topmost example to follow and also to submit to Muhammad, not just Allah).

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: